davidname.london
  • Home
  • Arca
  • Anthos
  • Lignis
  • Vitris
  • Gymnos
  • Forma
  • Nemoris
  • Structa
  • Thalis
  • CMYK
  • Kalos
  • Incis
  • Stylus
  • Pull
  • Ceta
  • Synthetica
  • Ficta
  • Floramica
  • Textura
  • Vectoria
  • Anthomania
  • Elysia
  • Echo
  • Dandy
  • More
    • Home
    • Arca
    • Anthos
    • Lignis
    • Vitris
    • Gymnos
    • Forma
    • Nemoris
    • Structa
    • Thalis
    • CMYK
    • Kalos
    • Incis
    • Stylus
    • Pull
    • Ceta
    • Synthetica
    • Ficta
    • Floramica
    • Textura
    • Vectoria
    • Anthomania
    • Elysia
    • Echo
    • Dandy
davidname.london
  • Home
  • Arca
  • Anthos
  • Lignis
  • Vitris
  • Gymnos
  • Forma
  • Nemoris
  • Structa
  • Thalis
  • CMYK
  • Kalos
  • Incis
  • Stylus
  • Pull
  • Ceta
  • Synthetica
  • Ficta
  • Floramica
  • Textura
  • Vectoria
  • Anthomania
  • Elysia
  • Echo
  • Dandy
Screenprint-style male portrait, bold colours—synthographic artwork by davidname.

Pull

Screenprinting is a process of pressure, resistance, and chance. Ink is dragged across mesh. Colour leaks through a stencil. Pull is a series of male portraits and figure studies with a shamelessly queer aesthetic: not camp, but coded; not theatrical, but stylised. These are not photographs. They are not reproductions. They are images created entirely with artificial intelligence, designed to feel physical, tactile, and printed by hand. Simulations of printmaking itself—where muscle becomes geometry, colour becomes gesture, and each figure emerges from a collision between language and code. What remains is not the body, but a record of its conversion. Bold, layered, colourful. Serigraphy is still alive, but Pull is nostalgic for a process no longer necessary in the age of digital reproduction.


The visual language of Pull draws heavily from twentieth-century silkscreen practices—stripped of kitsch and cliché, and reframed through a contemporary lens. Fluorescent overlays, halftone textures, and misregistration are used deliberately: not as decoration, but as artefacts of the process. The figures are often isolated—reduced, faceless, dehumanised—transforming the motif into icon, object, or surface. The figure is often confrontational: buttocks centred like punctuation. This is not eroticism for the sake of it. It’s an engagement with the history of art.


Screenprinting once belonged to commerce: posters, packaging, protest, and pop. Here, it becomes a fiction of itself. Synthetic ink pulled across an imaginary screen, rendered not with mesh and squeegee, but with prediction. AI is not a camera. It’s not a printing press. It reconstructs the body—piece by piece—hallucinating idealised forms from the debris of visual culture. These images do not aim for truth. They aim for presence. Marginalia—false signatures, edition marks, stray textures—are left intact. They are not mistakes. They are part of the medium—evidence not of failure, but of simulation. Pull doesn’t document the body—it guesses. These aren’t men. They’re impressions: digital, idealised, erotic, fractured. They don’t pose for approval. They declare presence. They demand to be looked at—then pull you closer.

“The nude is not naked. It is clothed in art.” — John Berger

Copyright © davidname 2025. 

All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept